The arrest sent shockwaves through the global tech industry. It raised fundamental questions about : Could the head of an online platform be held personally and criminally responsible for content uploaded by a third-party user?
In 2004 a grainy, two–to–three minute video filmed on a student’s mobile phone exploded into a national scandal in India. The clip showed two 11th‑standard students from Delhi Public School, R.K. Puram — a boy and a girl — in an intimate act; it was shared without the girl’s informed consent, circulated by MMS across phones and posted online. The episode exposed gaps in law, digital literacy, gendered blame, and how quickly private life can become public in the digital age.
“DM me for the link (just for research purposes, mods).” These are the individuals driving the "search volume" for the keyword. They create dummy Telegram channels, sell fake links (leading to malware or Rick Rolls), and generally muddy the waters between fact and fiction. They treat the scandal as a game. dps rk puram mms scandal 2004 34
The recent social media discussion and "viral video" mentions regarding Delhi Public School (DPS), R.K. Puram
The scandal gained massive notoriety when the video was listed for sale on Bazee.com (now eBay India). An IIT-Kharagpur graduate and a local shopkeeper were involved in attempting to monetize the clip. This commercialization triggered a swift crackdown by the Delhi Police, leading to the arrest of the students involved, the sellers, and, most controversially, Avnash Bajaj, the CEO of Bazee.com. The arrest sent shockwaves through the global tech industry
The incident involved two Class 11 students: a boy and a girl. The boy, later identified as Hemant Chugh, used his . It was reportedly recorded without the girl’s knowledge or consent.
While the authenticity of the video remains unconfirmed by authorities, the hashtag #DPSRKPuram has trended multiple times, sparking a fierce debate about student privacy, cyber bullying, and the ethics of viral outrage. The clip showed two 11th‑standard students from Delhi
Mobile phones were strictly banned or regulated in schools nationwide.
The Delhi High Court held that while Bajaj could not be held liable under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the company's actions, he could be prosecuted under the IT Act as the person in charge of the business. Lasting Impact 🛡️
